Note on Expected Capacity Cost (Applied): This metric exists in Business Central's RPO Statistics report but is computed as a runtime FlowField — it is not stored in any underlying table and cannot be reliably extracted via OData. The three remaining cost types have been reconstructed accurately from Prod Order Routing Lines, Value Entries, and Capacity Ledger Entries. The Applied Capacity Cost column is shown as a known gap pending a manual calculation workaround.
Finished production orders — expected vs actual cost variance Positive variance = over budget · negative = under budget
| RPO no. |
Source item |
Finished date |
Output qty |
Material cost |
Operation cost |
Capacity overhead |
Cap. cost applied ⚠ |
| Expected | Actual | Variance |
Expected | Actual | Variance |
Expected | Actual | Variance |
Expected | BC FlowField |
Total variance by cost type All finished orders in selection
Material variance by item Cumulative across all orders
Cost prediction methodology: Expected costs for in-progress orders are derived from BOM component costs × required quantities, plus routing line expected times × work center rates. This mirrors Business Central's internal calculation logic and has been validated against finished order actuals. Orders are flagged when predicted cost trajectory diverges significantly from the expected standard cost.
In-progress production orders — predicted cost vs expected Based on BOM cost shares and routing line data
| RPO no. |
Source item |
Status |
Due date |
Output qty |
% complete |
Expected total |
Predicted total |
Variance |
Variance % |
Trend |
Predicted vs expected by order Sorted by variance
Completion vs cost consumed Orders above the line are spending ahead of progress